Legal Opinion
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 23, 2026No. 5:20-cv-06326Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 Case No. 20-cv-06326-EJD 8 IN RE CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO 9 DISMISS OR EXCLUDE BASED ON RES JUDICATA DEFENSE 10 This Document Relates To: Re: ECF No. 233 11 ALL ACTIONS 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss or exclude certain Plaintiffs from this 14 litigation based on res judicata. Defs.’ Opening Br., ECF No. 233. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition, 15 and Defendants filed a Reply. Opp., ECF No. 266; Reply, ECF No. 273. The Court requested 16 additional…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.