Legal Opinion

United National Insurance v. Hydro Tank, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2007No. 06-20335PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:

This insurance coverage dispute requires the interpretation of an insurance policy’s Pollution Exclusion clause and a Contractors Limitation Endorsement Clause. Finding no error in the district *447court’s conclusion that coverage was barred by the first clause and not resurrected by the latter one, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

Three Hydro Tank workers were injured in July 2002 while removing petroleum-byproduct sludge from a mixing tank owned and operated by Appellant Motiva Enterprises at its Port Arthur, Texas, refinery. Shortly after entering the tank, two of the workers…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
  2. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Georgia & Florida Railnet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Noble Energy, Inc. v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Century Surety Company v. Ajredin DeariCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. American Home Assurance CompanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API