Legal Opinion
Ippolito v. Ono-Lennon
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
Defendant Yoko Ono Lennon moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 *231(a) (7), to dismiss plaintiff Adam Ippolito’s complaint. The complaint alleges four causes of action: invasion of privacy (Civil Rights Law §§ 50, 51), fraudulent misrepresentation, conversion and unfair competition (consisting of misappropriar tion of property rights and "palming off”). Subsequent to the initial return date of the motion, a motion was made by Extraordinary Event, Inc., doing business as One-to-One (hereinafter referred to as the producers or Extraordinary Event), pursuant to CPLR…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- County of Westchester v. Welton Becket AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Stephano v. News Group Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenfeld v. W.B. SaundersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Fairway Constructors, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Ippolito v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- PaF Srl v. Lisa Lighting Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- People v. BorrielloNew York Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.