Legal Opinion

Young v. Hobbs

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1996No. S-6416PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The central issue presented by this appeal is whether the superior court properly ruled that the parties agreed to a settlement contract.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Dale Young and Marion Hobbs were involved in Wilderness Acquisitions, Inc., a corporation which attempted to build a wilderness lodge on Baranof Island in Southeast Alaska. In the course of the corporation’s dissolution, a number of issues were contested, and eventually litigated, including the issue of ownership of high density polyethylene pipe that had been transported to the Baranof…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Childs v. Kalgin Island LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Juliano v. AngeliniAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Magill v. Nelbro Packing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Copper River School District v. TrawAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API