Legal Opinion

Gooden v. Comm'r of Corr.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 19, 2016No. AC 38169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.

*334The petitioner, Eric Gooden, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that his trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance at his sentencing. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following facts and procedural history are necessary for our discussion. On April 3, 2007, the petitioner was arrested and charged in the Superior Court at Manchester in docket number H12M-CR-07-0210233-T. He was incarcerated in lieu of bond while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Horn v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Tyson v. Armstrong, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API