Legal Opinion
Crosland v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2001No. 99 CIV. 10483(SAS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Willis Crosland, a retired police officer, has sued the City of New York, the New
York City Police Department (“NYPD”), and the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund (“PPF”) asserting numerous civil rights violations under federal and state law. Defendants now move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
' A. Retaliation Against Plaintiff
Crosland, a black male, was hired as a police officer with the NYPD in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gross v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Sundaram v. Brookhaven National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Maxton v. Underwriter Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Fanelli v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.