Legal Opinion

Clevenger v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Od. rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hendrickson, J.

This is a rule to show cause why a new tri,al should not be had. The suit was brought by the trustee of a bankrupt corporation to recover of the defendant the *149amount remaining due upon stock alleged to have been subscribed for and then held in the bankrupt company pursuant to the order and direction of the United States District Court of ISTew Jersey. The number of shares alleged to be so held was one hundred and four, of the par value of $100. The plaintiff claimed that no part of the subscription for the stock had been paid by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hills v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Hood v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shipman v. Portland Const. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sullivan v. FarnsworthTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kelley v. AaronsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API