Legal Opinion

Hood v. McNaughton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Oil rule to snow cause. Argued at February Term, 1892, before Beasley, Chief Justice, and Justices Depue aud Van Syckel.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The defendant was an original subscriber to the capital stock of the Fidelity Trust and Safe Deposit Company for ten shares of the par value of $100 each, on which only ten per cent, of the subscription price has been paid.

The by-laws of the said company provide that “ transfers of stock shall be made only on the books of the company. That no transfer shall be made until the certificate granted to the transferrer is delivered up to the company, and the possess ■sion of a certificate of stock shall not be regarded as vesting any ownership…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shellington v. . HowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Adler v. Milwaukee Patent Brick Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Nathan v. WhitlockNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  5. Spear v. GrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
  2. Cumberland Lumber Co. v. Clinton Hill Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. Butts v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Brown v. AllebachU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Clevenger v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API