Legal Opinion

People v. Blue

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Friedman, J.

The question presented is whether an identification proce*1001dure is unduly suggestive where the police show a complaining witness six photographs successively, that is, one photograph at a time, rather than showing them together as an array. I conclude that such a procedure is permissible. In fact, psychological research indicates that such a procedure results in a more reliable identification than a traditional photo array.

The credible testimony elicited at a Wade hearing indicates that at 10:15 p.m. on October 23, 1994, defendant entered a meat market on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re James H.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. RawlingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re an Investigation of ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. HammondsNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API