People v. Blue
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Friedman, J.
The question presented is whether an identification proce*1001dure is unduly suggestive where the police show a complaining witness six photographs successively, that is, one photograph at a time, rather than showing them together as an array. I conclude that such a procedure is permissible. In fact, psychological research indicates that such a procedure results in a more reliable identification than a traditional photo array.
The credible testimony elicited at a Wade hearing indicates that at 10:15 p.m. on October 23, 1994, defendant entered a meat market on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re James H.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. RawlingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re an Investigation of ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. HammondsNew York Supreme Court · 2003