Legal Opinion

In re an Investigation of Thomas

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert S. Kreindler, J.

The People move, on notice to Rahim Thomas (Thomas), for an order placing Thomas in a lineup. In conjunction with the motion the People have annexed an order granting them an unrestricted lineup. Thomas has consented to the lineup and has submitted a detailed order as to how the People are to conduct the lineup. Among other requests, Thomas asks the court to order the People to conduct a double blind sequential lineup.

In deciding which order, if any, to sign, the court has considered the People’s motion and order dated October 23, 2001, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. HammondsNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. WoolcockNew York Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API