Legal Opinion

Chicken Delight of California, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1973No. Civ. 40499PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

— Declaratory relief. Two corporations, Chicken Delight of California, Inc., and Chicken Delight, Inc., an Illinois Corporation (“Chicken Delight”) 1 appeal from an unsuccessful attempt to obtain a declaration that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) should have defended them in an action for personal injuries and are responsible for reimbursing them for the cost of defense and the sum of $15,000 which Chicken Delight paid for a release.

Facts

The accident which ultimately led to this litigation happened on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. American States Insurance v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Clark v. Bellefonte InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Williams v. Community Drive-In Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Government Employees InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API