Okey v. Bargenholt

The sole issue here concerns the place of contract. It is conceded in argument that if the note sued on was a Colorado contract it is barred by the statute of limitations of that state. The factual evidence is not seriously in dispute. The controversy grows almost entirely out of the conflicting inferences drawn by the parties from the meager facts shown.

The note was dated, “Corning, Iowa, Aug. 21, 1919,” and was payable sixty days after date tó the order of plaintiff “at the Okey Vernon National Bank, Corning, Iowa.” Plaintiff and his brother, Ed Okey, operated the bank at that time.

Defendant…