Legal Opinion

Jarl v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 16, 1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Clarke District Court. — P. C. Winter, Judge. Recovery on a promissory note was, denied because barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Limitation of actions: when contract “arises” in foreign state. — Plaintiff is the payee in a note for $2,272.97, executed by the defendant Fred Pritchett, July 16, 1906, payable one year after date. This note was given by the maker in Colorado, and a mortgage covering land in Iowa thence executed to secure its payment. Foreclosure of the mortgage was not sought in this action, but a writ of attachment was sued out and levied on the mortgaged land. The petition, filed November 13,1919, alleged, and the evidence proved, that the defendant had not been a resident of this state since the note…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Clinton County v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Gower v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. McDonald v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Locken v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Monast v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Acme Feeds Inc. v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API