Jarl v. Pritchett
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clarke District Court. — P. C. Winter, Judge. Recovery on a promissory note was, denied because barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
1. Limitation of actions: when contract “arises” in foreign state. — Plaintiff is the payee in a note for $2,272.97, executed by the defendant Fred Pritchett, July 16, 1906, payable one year after date. This note was given by the maker in Colorado, and a mortgage covering land in Iowa thence executed to secure its payment. Foreclosure of the mortgage was not sought in this action, but a writ of attachment was sued out and levied on the mortgaged land. The petition, filed November 13,1919, alleged, and the evidence proved, that the defendant had not been a resident of this state since the note…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Clinton County v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Gower v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- McDonald v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Locken v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Monast v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Acme Feeds Inc. v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.