Legal Opinion

Gagnon v. DiVittorio

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

These are two actions of tort, the first being brought to recover for personal injuries, and the second for consequential damages. The cases were tried to a jury and at the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict in his favor in each case. The motions were denied subject to the defendant’s exceptions, and the jury returned a verdict in each case for the plaintiff.

The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiffs would warrant the jury in finding the following facts: Rose Gagnon, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, was living with her husband at 41 Vine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Pease v. LenssenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Nicholson v. BabbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Stinson v. SobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Kneizys v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Greenfield v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Altman v. Barron's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Marengo v. RoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API