Legal Opinion

Marengo v. Roy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This action is for conscious suffering and death of the plaintiff’s intestate, a boy six years and three months of age, which resulted from his being burned on May 27, 1941, in a tar kettle containing hot tar located in the back yard of a tenement house in which his father, the plaintiff, was a tenant at 52 West Street in Holyoke.

The jury found for the defendants on counts alleging wilful, wanton, and reckless conduct but returned verdicts for the plaintiff on counts alleging negligence. On leave reserved the judge entered verdicts for the defendants on the negligence counts as well. The only…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Electric Light Co. v. Deliso Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Bellows v. Worcester Storage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Leahy v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Morrison v. MedagliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Edgarton v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Greenfield v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Ryder v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API