Moffett v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n Casualty Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
It is well settled that judgment should not be entered in favor of a defendant on a question of law, raised in lieu of demurrer under section 20 of the Practice Act of 1915, P. L. 483, unless it is clear that a good cause of action cannot be made for plaintiff by amending the statement: Rhodes v. Terheyden, 272 Pa. 397, 116 A. 364; Leonard Seed Co. v. Burgerhoff Co., 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 381, 383; Geiger v. United States F. & G. Co., 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 554, 558, 184 A. 464.
These actions of assumpsit were brought by the respective plaintiffs against the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Lykens Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Geiger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Leonard Seed Co. v. Lustig Burgerhoff Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monroe County Motor Co. v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Sky v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Guidici v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Fish v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Klock v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.