Legal Opinion

Leonard Seed Co. v. Lustig Burgerhoff Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1925No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal contains three complaints: (1) that plaintiff was permitted to amend its statement; (2) that defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was refused; (3) that judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was entered.

In 1920, plaintiff sold to defendant 200 bushels of onions, for delivery between the 1st and 15th of March, 1921; before delivery date, defendant advised plaintiff it would not accept the onioné and requested plaintiff not to ship them. On March 5, 1921, plaintiff notified defendant that it held the onions subject to defendant’s order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Jackson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Leonard Seed Co. v. Lustig Burgerhoff Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Geiger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Moffett v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Apparel Arts Publications, Inc. v. United Knitting Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API