Legal Opinion
Klock v. Allstate Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrank Del Vecchio, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment in an action brought on a policy of insurance issued by defendant by which plaintiff seeks a judgment deelar*991ing that his insurer must defend an action brought against him by one Carmella Morabito or must pay for damages which are the basis of that action.
On April 22, 1961 plaintiff was involved in an accident while operating the automobile of Miss Morabito without her permission or consent. Thereafter, the owner commenced an action against plaintiff to recover the sum of $945, representing the damage to her 1956 Oldsmobile in the accident.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Birnbaum v. Jamestown Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Crist v. Potomac Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Columbia Helicopters, Inc., a Corporation, and Marvin E. Lematta v. Transport Indemnity Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.