Legal Opinion

Alkuda v. McDonald Hopkins Co., L.P.A.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 18, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01103Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SARAH ELIZABETH ALKUDA, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:24-cv-1103 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN ) v. ) ) MCDONALD HOPKINS CO., L.P.A., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) Before the Court is Defendant McDonald Hopkins Co., L.P.A.’s (“McDonald Hopkins”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff Sarah Alkuda (“Plaintiff” or “Alkuda”) opposed the motion (Docs. 13, 14-1), and Defendant replied. (Doc. 16.) For the reasons below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gwendolyn T. Graham-Humphreys, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API