Legal Opinion
Phillips Pipeline Co. v. Richardson
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
Decided October 24, 1984No. 08-83-00043-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, Justice.
This appeal complains of the recovery by Dane Richardson, as Plaintiff, for damages awarded to him for injuries received from a pipeline blowout and concerns the inadmissible reference to insurance during the trial. The rights of the Defendant, Phillips Pipeline Company, to be indemnified by Gulf Oil Corporation and Three Way Constructors, Inc., are also involved. We affirm the judgment of the trial court which awarded the Plaintiff his damages and which denied Phillips Pipeline Company any right of indemnification as to Gulf Oil Corporation. We reverse and remand for new…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
- Joe Adams & Son v. McCann Construction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Sira & Payne, Inc. v. Wallace & RiddleTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Sun Oil Co. v. Renshaw Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
3Cited by22 opinions
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Anderson v. Vinson Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Fuentes v. McFadden, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.