Joe Adams & Son v. McCann Construction Company
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice.
The question to be decided is whether subcontractor-petitioner, Joe Adams & Son, is legally obligated to indemnify general contractor-respondent, McCann Construction Company, Inc., against the consequences of the respondent’s own negligence. The trial court answered the question in the negative and rendered a summary take-nothing judgment in McCann’s suit for indemnity. The Court of Civil Appeals answered the question in the affirmative, reversed the trial court’s judgment, severed the issue of indemnity from the issues of attorney’s fee, costs, etc., rendered summary judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Spence & Howe Construction Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- Mitchell's, Inc. v. FriedmanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Ohio Oil Company v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Houston & T. C. R. v. Diamond Press Brick Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Getty Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Storage & Processors, Inc. v. ReyesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.