Legal Opinion
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1956No. 08-5431PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
This case possesses novelty, but, when analyzed, is not difficult to decide.
On July 14, 1919, in a conference among their representatives — superintendents, train masters and chief clerks —three interstate railroad carriers, being operated by the United States Railroad Administration, reached an agreement to cover “handling the interchange” among their lines, including the use of a railroad bridge owned by one of the carriers. The agreement was to become effective on August 1, 1919. The three contracting parties were The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, The Chesapeake &…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Consolidated Jewelers, Inc. v. Standard Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Island Creek Fuel & Transportation Co. v. Kenova Terminal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1957
- Associated Resources Corp. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.