Associated Resources Corp. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment determining (1) that the plaintiffs (appellants) were entitled to nothing upon their claim for $25,000 damages for the alleged destruction of an oil well asserted to be due to the negligence of the defendant (appellee) in the performance of its contract for the cementing of the well, and (2) that the defendant was, upon its counterclaim, entitled to $264.05, the amount the plaintiffs had contracted to pay it as compensation for the use of its equipment and service men in the cementing of the well. Federal jurisdic*958tion is based…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Minneapolis-Moline Co. v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Riddle Quarries, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Associated Resources Corporation v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956