Legal Opinion

Mansoldo v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 5, 2006PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Zazzali

When the state regulates lands to protect the environment and provide for the general welfare of its citizens there are inevitably consequences that affect the rights of property owners. In this matter, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued a regulation that severely restricts construction in the Hackensack River floodway for the laudatory goal of limiting flood damage and loss of life along the river. A consequence of that regulation, however, is that it prohibits plaintiff Ronald Mansoldo from constructing two single-family homes on his property that otherwise…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  4. Klumpp v. Borough of AvalonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Trans. v. Marlton PlazaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API