Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of Ohio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDouglas, J.
As indicated by the majority, there are four major issues for us to resolve in this case. I write separately because our determination of these issues could very well have an effect on administrative law and labor relations in our state for an extended period of time.
I
In proposition of law number four, appellee, “MRDD,” argues that the State Employment Relations Board, “SERB,” is not a proper party to common pleas court proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 119.12. The court of appeals agreed with MRDD on the basis that SERB is not a “person” or “party” within the meaning of R.C. 119.01 and,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Stewart v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- South Community, Inc. v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Blue Cross of Northeast Ohio v. RatchfordOhio Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.