Legal Opinion

Contracting & Material Co. v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 21, 1974No. 58552PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barrett

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in a contract action following a bench trial. The trial court found: (a) that defendant did not breach its construction contract with plaintiff; (b) that defendant was not wrongful or inequitable in any of its dealings with plaintiff; and (c) that plaintiff breached the construction contract by failing to work two 8-hour shifts each day, 5 days a week during the times in question. In conclusion, the trial court found all issues in the case in favor of defendant and denied recovery by plaintiff.

We reverse the judgment.

On appeal, the basic issue is one of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Watson Lumber Co. v. GuennewigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Underground Construction Co. v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Llewellyn v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
  2. Sherman R. Smoot Co. v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Fru-Con Corp. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1996
  4. Contracting & Material Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Contracting & Material Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API