Legal Opinion · Dissent

Government Employees Insurance v. Dizol

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1998No. 95-17393Published

1DissentAlarcon, Circuit Judge

with whom Judges FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI join.

I respectfully dissent.

In Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America, 316 U.S. 491, 62 S.Ct. 1173, 86 L.Ed. 1620 (1942), the Supreme Court instructed that in an action filed pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, a district court has the duty to determine whether the presentation of the plaintiffs claim in state court has been foreclosed under applicable law or whether it can be tested in a pending state court proceeding. Id. at 495-96, 62 S.Ct. at 1175-76.

In Wilton v. Seven Falls Co., 515 U.S. 277, 115 S.Ct. 2137, 132 L.Ed.2d 214…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API