Legal Opinion

Hulsey v. Johnson & Holen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1991No. S-3859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. BURKE; Justice.

I

In February 1987, Ms. Geneva Hulsey contacted the law firm of Johnson & Holen, seeking representation in her efforts to reopen two related claims: a workers’ compensation claim and an arbitration claim. Elizabeth Johnson, of Johnson & Holen, undertook to represent Ms. Hulsey in both actions.

In March 1988, before it would agree to hear the merits of Ms. Hulsey’s request to reopen the compensation claim, the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) directed the parties to address a statute of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Metcalf v. Felec ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Titan Enterprises, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Sulkosky v. Morrison-KnudsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sandra Rusch and Barbara Dockter v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Gilstrap v. International Contractors Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API