State v. Blackman
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
REILLY, P.J.
The State appeals from an order
of the circuit court granting Adam M. Blackman's motion to suppress blood test evidence obtained under Wisconsin's implied consent law. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. (2013-14)1 authorizes law enforcement to request a blood, breath, or urine sample from a driver involved in an accident that causes death or great bodily harm if the officer has reason to believe the driver violated a traffic law. Blackman was in*638volved in an accident when he turned left in front of an oncoming bicyclist and was asked for a sample of his blood per the implied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PadleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Gary F. LembergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John FlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
- State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.