Legal Opinion

State v. Blackman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 3, 2016No. 2015AP450-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

REILLY, P.J.

The State appeals from an order

of the circuit court granting Adam M. Blackman's motion to suppress blood test evidence obtained under Wisconsin's implied consent law. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(3)(ar)2. (2013-14)1 authorizes law enforcement to request a blood, breath, or urine sample from a driver involved in an accident that causes death or great bodily harm if the officer has reason to believe the driver violated a traffic law. Blackman was in*638volved in an accident when he turned left in front of an oncoming bicyclist and was asked for a sample of his blood per the implied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. PadleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  5. State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Gary F. LembergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John FlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
  4. State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API