Legal Opinion
Culwell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1935No. 1375PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKMAN, Chief Justice.
Before considering the case on its merits, we take notice of the motion of defendant in error to dismiss the appeal. The grounds for such motion are: (1) The transcript does not contain any motion for a new trial; and (2) no assignments of error appear in the transcript. The first ground is not well taken. It is not required of an appellant or plaintiff in error that he file a motion for a new trial. Of course, there are certain questions which must be presented to the, trial court in a motion for new trial before we would be authorized to consider same, as, for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Taylor v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. LewallenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. CulwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spicewood Summit Office Condominiums Ass'n v. America First Lloyd's Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Holston v. Implement Dealers Mut. Fire Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. O'GormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Jett v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- National Military Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.