Legal Opinion

Buffalo Park Lane, Inc. v. City of Buffalo

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

In the first above-entitled action the plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants therein from enforcing by penalty suits and criminal process, certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Buffalo, which provisions the defendant city claims to be applicable to premises on the north side of Lancaster avenue in *209the city of Buffalo, which premises are owned and used as a parking lot for guests by plaintiff in such first-entitled action and which provisions the plaintiff in süch action claims are not applicable to the premises in question. For the purposes of convenience such first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Matter of Eaton v. SweenyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Cranford v. . Tyrrell.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Zahn v. Newark Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Gauthier v. Village of LarchmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Thomas v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. City of Providence v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API