Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of University Park
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 15, 1951No. 2871PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
Cullen S. Thomas and Olga S. Thomas have long owned and occupied as their residence land in that portion of University Park designated in its zoning ordinances as a “single-family dwelling district.” Said home consists of about four acres of land on which is located their residence, servant’s house, garage and accessory improvements used as a part of such residence. On said premises the Thomases have a barbecue pit, swings and other facilities which they use as incidental and accessory to their residence. The Thomases wish to build a small private swimming pool, 17 by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Western Theological Seminary v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Kenney v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Ashton v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Currey v. KimpleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Sechrist v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- STATE HOME BUILDERS LIC. BD. v. SowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Hardy v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- City of Kermit v. SpruillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.