Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1911No. Civ. No. 863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. C. Chapman, W. C. Sharpstein, and W. R. Bacon, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal taken by defendant from a judgment rendered by the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant, upon a policy of life insurance issued by defendant to Elizabeth A. Morgan upon the life of her husband, Orson A. Morgan.

To properly discuss the questions of law involved in this case a somewhat extended statement of the facts will be necessary. They are as follows:

On March 26, 1866, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Sulz v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Eklund v. EklundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Kumor v. Scottish UnionWyoming Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API