Legal Opinion

C-B

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2012No. ID 3764PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

25 I&N Dec. 888

(BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3764 Matter of C-B-, Respondent Decided August 15, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to meaningfully effectuate the statutory and regulatory privilege of legal representation where it has not been expressly waived by a respondent, an Immigration Judge must grant a reasonable and realistic period of time to provide a fair opportunity for the respondent to seek, speak with, and retain counsel. (2) If a respondent expresses a fear of persecution or harm in a country…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mooneer Riad Tawadrus v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Nestor Rodrigo Rios-Berrios v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. SIBRUNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  4. Jona Kipkorir Biwot v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hernan Patricio Castro-O'ryan v. United States Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. W-Y-UBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  2. Mendoza-Garcia v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Hernandez Lara v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. PINZONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
  5. H-A-A-VBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API