Legal Opinion
H-A-A-V
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided September 11, 2025No. ID 4127PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
29 I&N Dec. 233
(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4127 Matter of H-A-A-V-, Respondent Decided September 11, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals If the factual allegations underlying a claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture, viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent, do not establish prima facie eligibility for relief or protection, an Immigration Judge may pretermit the applications without a full evidentiary hearing on the merits of the claim. FOR THE RESPONDENT:…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Roy v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Martinez v. Bally's Louisiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Fany Ramirez-Mejia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- C-I-G-M- & L-V-S-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- J-H-M-HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- A-M-Z-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Carlos Giovanny M.R. v. Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- G-R-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.