Legal Opinion

Timms v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1979No. 99295, CA 9961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*341TANZER, J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order granting post-conviction relief on the ground of denial of effective representation of counsel because petitioner’s trial attorney failed to assert the doctrine of collateral estoppel as a ground for suppression of evidence.

In 1973, two policemen stopped and searched petitioner’s automobile. Petitioner was driving and one Gerald Woods was a passenger. The officers found two loaded revolvers, one under each seat, and dangerous drugs.

Woods was charged with a weapons offense. The trial court granted his motion to suppress, holding that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Harris v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Rook v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. MozoroskyOregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. DeWhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Timms v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API