State v. Mozorosky
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.
We granted the petition for review in this case because of the perplexing questions concerning the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
The defendant was charged with theft (formerly embezzlement) from his employer. He was charged in eight indictments which were identical except each covered a different period of time. With defendant’s approval the indictments were consolidated for trial. The jury acquitted the defendant on two indictments, was unable to agree on the remaining six, and, therefore, was discharged. The defendant moved for dismissal of the remaining six on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.