Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1982No. C80-10-33681, CA A20373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his jury conviction for robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415. 1 He contends that the court erred (1) in denying his motion in limine and motion for new trial, because the state was collaterally estopped to litigate whether he was armed with a deadly weapon; (2) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because the evidence was insufficient to show a weapon was used in the robbery; and (3) in imposing an excessive sentence.

Richard Ashley was working at a Plaid Pantry in Portland when two men entered wearing handkerchiefs over their faces and said, “This is a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AlleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. Superior Court (Sparks)California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. DeWhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API