State v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction for robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415. 1 He contends that the court erred (1) in denying his motion in limine and motion for new trial, because the state was collaterally estopped to litigate whether he was armed with a deadly weapon; (2) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, because the evidence was insufficient to show a weapon was used in the robbery; and (3) in imposing an excessive sentence.
Richard Ashley was working at a Plaid Pantry in Portland when two men entered wearing handkerchiefs over their faces and said, “This is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AlleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. Superior Court (Sparks)California Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DeWhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986