Legal Opinion
Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 9, 2007No. 06-6337PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Petitioners Mobil Exploration & Producing, U.S. (“MEPUS”) and Mobil Natural Gas, Inc. (“MNGI”) removed a putative class action filed in Oklahoma state court to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), Pub L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 28 U.S.C.). The District Court remanded the case to state court. MEPUS and MNGI then filed a petition in this Court for leave to appeal the remand order. Because we conclude that this action commenced prior to the effective date of CAFA, we do not have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Romia Pritchett, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Individuals Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Mary Plubell, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merck & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Randall & BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conrad v. Phone Directories Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Reece v. AES CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Coffey v. Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Geismann v. AESTHETICARE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.