Legal Opinion
Romia Pritchett, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Individuals Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2005No. 05-0501PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This case presents a question of first impression: Whether the removal provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (codified in scattered sections of 28 U.S.C.) (hereinafter “Class Action Fairness Act” or “the Act”), apply to pending state court cases that were removed after the effective date of the Act. On March 18, 2005, we entered an order in this case holding that the Act does not apply to pending state cases and denying Defendant’s Petition for Leave to Appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We now issue this opinion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States Ex Rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Combs v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Lussier v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Isaiah Evans v. Walter IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Palisades Collections LLC v. ShortsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Leslie Miedema v. Maytag CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Bush v. Cheaptickets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.