City of Portland v. Roth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for disobeying a police officer at an assembly, a violation of Portland City Code (PCC) section 14.24.100. We reverse.
We begin by considering defendant’s argument that the ordinance under which he was convicted is preempted by ORS 162.315.1 In City of Portland v. Jackson, 316 Or 143, 151, 850 P2d 1093 (1993), the Supreme Court specified the procedure that governs this type of challenge:
“[W]e first must examine the ordinance and statutes that the parties claim are in conflict. Next, we determine what conduct the ordinance prohibits. Third, we look to see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Eugene v. KrukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- City of Portland v. HemstreetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011