Lowenstein v. CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this employment discrimination action, plaintiff Sarah Lowenstein alleges that defendants unlawfully denied her medical leave and discriminated against her based on her medical condition. Presently before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the motion in part and denies it in part.
II. BACKGROUND 1
Defendant St. Mary Medical Center (“SMMC”) is a Pennsylvania corporation. (Compl. ¶ 3.) Catholic Health East (“CHE”), also a defendant, is SMMC’s parent company. See Regional Health Corporations,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Roller v. Riley Riper Hollin & ColagrecoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Ford-Greene v. NHS, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hills v. Borough of ColwynDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Macvaugh v. Cnty. of MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Attanasio v. Community Health Systems Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.