Legal Opinion

Roller v. Riley Riper Hollin & Colagreco

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-2933PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JONES, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, David M. Koller, began his employment with Defendant, Riley Riper Hollín & Colagreco, at the end of August 2007. During his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff sustained a knee injury, which required him to undergo surgery and to utilize time under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 260-2654 (2006), hereinafter “FMLA.” Several weeks after his surgery, Defendant terminated Plaintiffs employment, citing economic issues as the reason. Accordingly, Plaintiff commenced the within action by filing a Complaint in which he…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sampson v. Methacton School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Rocco v. Gordon Food ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Brzozowski v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Bush v. DonahoeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Macvaugh v. Cnty. of MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API