Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1922No. 3032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

This cause is before this court upon petition for certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals therein. Duncan v. Swift & Co., 27 Ga. App. 820 (110 S. E. 21). That decision is as follows: “ A certified copy of the official analysis of a brand of fertilizer registered with the Department of Agriculture is admissible in evidence in any of the courts of this State, -in any case in which the question of the actual ingredients contained in the fertilizer is material. After a brand of fertilizer is registered with the Department of Agriculture, the grade can not be lowered; and it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cordele Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Arlington Oil & Guano Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Duncan v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. RainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Prescott v. Seacoast Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Blackshear Manufacturing Co. v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Georgia Fertilizer Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API