Legal Opinion · Dissent

S.R.D. v. T.L.B.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 2, 2005No. 2004-CA-001309-MRPublished

1DissentHenry, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

With our holding in this case, it is now the law in Kentucky that a married woman who has given birth to a child conceived in an extramarital affair need only show a possibility of emotional harm to the child in order to legally estop her husband from denying paternity even though DNA evidence proves conclusively that he cannot be the child’s father. This places Kentucky at the extreme margin of the minority of states which have approved the doctrine of “paternity by estoppel.” We have established this rule in this case even though the potential harm — that the child…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Yamnitz v. Polytech, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Wright v. BlackAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API