State v. Couplin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county, ■ charged with the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, tried in the district court for that county before Jelley, J., and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. From an. order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny in the first degree, and appeals from the order denying his m'otion for a new trial.
•The errors assigned challenge the sufficiency of the evidence; the conduct of the prosecuting attorney; the charge of the court, and the refusal to give requested instructions.
1. Defendant was jointly indicted with Philip Morgan and Frank P. Levine. 'The last named pleaded guilty to larceny in the second degree, and testified for the state in the trial of this defendant, as well as in the separate trial of Morgan. There is no question but that, on Saturday…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. BeltowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. SwarensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922