State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Martin county of the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of fourteen years, and upon being arraigned before the district court for that county pleaded not guilty. He was tried before Quinn, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict of guilty. Erom the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted, upon a verdict of guilty, in the district' court of the county of Martin, of the crime of carnally knowing a female child under fourteen years of age, and sentenced to hard labor in the state’s prison for the term of seven years. He appealed from a judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
His alleged errors are numerous, but the here important ones fall within two general groups: (a) Those relating to the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify his conviction of the felony; and (b) those relating to the charge of misconduct on the part…
2Cited by25 opinions
- State v. ThayerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. SchabertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.