State v. Miller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was tried in the district court for Olmsted county, before Start, J., and a jury, on an indictment for grand larceny in the first degree, and was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree. He appeals from the judgment entered after the denial of his motion for a new trial; ■
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendant excepted to the refusal of the •court to dismiss the action when the prosecution rested, and again to its refusal to direct a verdict for defendant when the evidence was all submitted; and also excepted “to that part of the charge in regard to recent possession, and the punishment for grand larceny in the fiist and second degrees.” There was also an exception to the refusal of the court to give to the jury the sixth special request of the defendant, which will be referred to later in the opinion. Upon these exceptions the defendant’s assignments of error chiefly rest.
1. We have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carroll v. WillistonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Alphonso T. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Irving Joseph Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- State v. BrightmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.