Legal Opinion

In re: G.R.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 2019No. 32/18Published

1Opinion of the Court

In re: G.R., No. 32, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Getty, J. [CRIMINAL LAW — PROBATION AND PUNISHMENT — CONDITIONS OF PROBATION — PARTICULAR TERMS AND CONDITIONS — RESTITUTION AND REPARATIONS] The Court of Appeals held that, where assailants stole house keys from a minor during an armed robbery, the victim’s costs associated with rekeying the locks the keys corresponded to directly resulted from the underlying robbery pursuant to Criminal Procedure Article § 11-603, because theft of the keys substantially reduced the value of the locks by jeopardizing the locks’ status as protectors of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Pete v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API