Legal Opinion

Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1919PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 15, 1916, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover accrued alimony under a foreign decree of divorce and for an accounting of alleged community property.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 15, 1916, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover accrued alimony under a foreign decree of divorce and for an accounting of alleged community property. The answer set up as separate defenses: 1. That the Nevada court had no jurisdiction because the defendant had gone into the state of Nevada for the special purpose of instituting habeas corpus proceedings to secure…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Glaser v. GlaserNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. In Re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Shea v. SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API